<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tech+Life+Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardneililagan.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardneililagan.com</link>
	<description>The not-so-secret website lair of Richard Neil Ilagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery event delegation, and one more reason why you should be using it more by John Vinny Marquez</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2012/03/jquery-delegate-another-use-case/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>John Vinny Marquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=1385#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Nice one bro! Reminding myself to read this article again so I can apply this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one bro! Reminding myself to read this article again so I can apply this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Deferred objects in jQuery 1.5+ by Richard Neil Ilagan</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/05/using-deferred-objects-in-jquery-1-5/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Neil Ilagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=986#comment-72</guid>
		<description>These days, I tend to actually call them just plain &quot;anonymous functions&quot; or &quot;lambdas&quot;. &quot;Function expressions&quot; work too. The way lambdas are called in C#.net come to mind. :)

Thanks for reading and the great compliments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, I tend to actually call them just plain &#8220;anonymous functions&#8221; or &#8220;lambdas&#8221;. &#8220;Function expressions&#8221; work too. The way lambdas are called in C#.net come to mind. :)</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and the great compliments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Deferred objects in jQuery 1.5+ by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/05/using-deferred-objects-in-jquery-1-5/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=986#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Very clearly explained with helpful examples. (Except: &quot;function literal&quot;? I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve heard that term before - in most of the places you used it I think I was expecting &quot;function expression&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Very clearly explained with helpful examples. (Except: &#8220;function literal&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve heard that term before &#8211; in most of the places you used it I think I was expecting &#8220;function expression&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PROTIP : Load Javascript into your pages asynchronously by Eric</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2010/09/protip-load-javascript-into-your-pages-asynchronously/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=611#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Seems not to work with IE7 :(
Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems not to work with IE7 :(<br />
Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to write a jQuery plugin by Richard Neil Ilagan</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/08/how-to-write-a-jquery-plugin/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Neil Ilagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=1245#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Hi Eddie,

Point well taken. But for purposes of illustration, I just thought to break that piece of code down for clarity. As you can see in the next example, I&#039;m doing exactly what you&#039;re suggesting.

Thanks for pointing that out though! Nice to see someone with a wary technical eye as you. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eddie,</p>
<p>Point well taken. But for purposes of illustration, I just thought to break that piece of code down for clarity. As you can see in the next example, I&#8217;m doing exactly what you&#8217;re suggesting.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out though! Nice to see someone with a wary technical eye as you. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to write a jQuery plugin by Eddie Monge</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/08/how-to-write-a-jquery-plugin/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Monge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=1245#comment-68</guid>
		<description>One bit of advice is to reduce the amount of code you use to do things. So for the example from above:
$.fn.foobar = function () {
    this.text(&#039;foobar&#039;);
    return this;
}

This example can add the text and since .text() as a setter returns the original jQuery object, it can be chained. Thus, the example can be rewritten using the more concise version:
$.fn.foobar = function () {
    return this.text(&#039;foobar&#039;);}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One bit of advice is to reduce the amount of code you use to do things. So for the example from above:<br />
$.fn.foobar = function () {<br />
    this.text(&#8216;foobar&#8217;);<br />
    return this;<br />
}</p>
<p>This example can add the text and since .text() as a setter returns the original jQuery object, it can be chained. Thus, the example can be rewritten using the more concise version:<br />
$.fn.foobar = function () {<br />
    return this.text(&#8216;foobar&#8217;);}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with FancyBox 1.2.6 in Internet Explorer 7 by Jing_ror_ja</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2009/12/problems-with-fancybox-1-2-6-in-internet-explorer-7/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing_ror_ja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=130#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much!, i&#039;m using fancybox v1.3.4 have this problem with ie7 too.

your solution so good. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much!, i&#8217;m using fancybox v1.3.4 have this problem with ie7 too.</p>
<p>your solution so good. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use Google+ to make sure Google searches on your person show the right information by Me</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/07/use-google-to-make-sure-google-searches-on-your-person-show-the-right-information/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=1204#comment-65</guid>
		<description>i think you&#039;re super cute. wanna date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you&#8217;re super cute. wanna date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LINQ and lambda expressions are highly efficient in filtering collections by Richard Neil Ilagan</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/02/linq-lambda-expressions-efficient-filtering-collections/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Neil Ilagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=837#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I admit I did. Thankfully, this post is four months old, and I&#039;ve switched the benchmarks over for something that does it properly.

Results aren&#039;t that clear-cut, but LINQ still gets by with better performance. I&#039;ll update this as soon as I have time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I admit I did. Thankfully, this post is four months old, and I&#8217;ve switched the benchmarks over for something that does it properly.</p>
<p>Results aren&#8217;t that clear-cut, but LINQ still gets by with better performance. I&#8217;ll update this as soon as I have time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LINQ and lambda expressions are highly efficient in filtering collections by dittodhole</title>
		<link>http://richardneililagan.com/2011/02/linq-lambda-expressions-efficient-filtering-collections/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>dittodhole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardneililagan.com/?p=837#comment-59</guid>
		<description>this ain&#039;t a valid benchmark!
... you forgot about deferred-execution ... LMAO ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this ain&#8217;t a valid benchmark!<br />
&#8230; you forgot about deferred-execution &#8230; LMAO &#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

